- Home
- Search Results
- Page 1 of 1
Search for: All records
-
Total Resources1
- Resource Type
-
0000000001000000
- More
- Availability
-
10
- Author / Contributor
- Filter by Author / Creator
-
-
Krishnan, Giri (1)
-
McNealy, Derrick (1)
-
Ramyaa, Ramyaa (1)
-
Swindle, Adrian (1)
-
#Tyler Phillips, Kenneth E. (0)
-
#Willis, Ciara (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Abramson, C. I. (0)
-
& Abreu-Ramos, E. D. (0)
-
& Adams, S.G. (0)
-
& Ahmed, K. (0)
-
& Ahmed, Khadija. (0)
-
& Aina, D.K. Jr. (0)
-
& Akcil-Okan, O. (0)
-
& Akuom, D. (0)
-
& Aleven, V. (0)
-
& Andrews-Larson, C. (0)
-
& Archibald, J. (0)
-
& Arnett, N. (0)
-
& Arya, G. (0)
-
- Filter by Editor
-
-
& Spizer, S. M. (0)
-
& . Spizer, S. (0)
-
& Ahn, J. (0)
-
& Bateiha, S. (0)
-
& Bosch, N. (0)
-
& Brennan K. (0)
-
& Brennan, K. (0)
-
& Chen, B. (0)
-
& Chen, Bodong (0)
-
& Drown, S. (0)
-
& Ferretti, F. (0)
-
& Higgins, A. (0)
-
& J. Peters (0)
-
& Kali, Y. (0)
-
& Ruiz-Arias, P.M. (0)
-
& S. Spitzer (0)
-
& Sahin. I. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S. (0)
-
& Spitzer, S.M. (0)
-
(submitted - in Review for IEEE ICASSP-2024) (0)
-
-
Have feedback or suggestions for a way to improve these results?
!
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
Obfuscation intends to decrease interpretability of code and identification of code behavior. Large Language Models(LLMs) have been proposed for code synthesis and code analysis. This paper attempts to understand how well LLMs can analyse code and identify code behavior. Specifically, this paper systematically evaluates several LLMs’ capabilities to detect obfuscated code and identify behavior across a variety of obfuscation techniques with varying levels of complexity. LLMs proved to be better at detecting obfuscations that changed identifiers, even to misleading ones, compared to obfuscations involving code insertions (unused variables, as well as variables that replace constants with expressions that evaluate to those constants). Hardest to detect were obfuscations that layered multiple simple transformations. For these, only 20-40% of the LLMs’ responses were correct. Adding misleading documentation was also successful in misleading LLMs. We provide all our code to replicate results at https://github.com/SwindleA/LLMCodeObfuscation. Overall, our results suggest a gap in LLMs’ ability to understand code.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
